The sin of the feminism

The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy tells about two ways of the feminism’s interpretation. One of them is a “Feminist Movement” as “a historically specific political movement in the US and Europe… that seeks justice for women”. This part of meaning is very volumetric topic and contains many historical descriptions which is not our subject to think about. Another point of view at the feminism is “Feminist Beliefs” or “the end of sexism in all forms”. We will analyze this statement because it’s more applicable to our society today.
I want to see the problem of feminism in context of general human’s wish to be free. There is inflexible will to be not dependable from anything. Each country wants to be sovereign. Each ethnic group wants to be independent from major nation. People climb to power and aim at success that would show their self-dependence in social life. Youth try to be married couple as financial independent partners. Children show signs of impatience to their parents’ guardianship as an infringement of young interests.  There is no one more silly idea than that. As a material being we always depend from many factors, and subjects, and other creatures. After all, we are depending from emotions and feelings which is greatest dependence in our life.
The 1971 Declaration of Feminism states, "All of history must be rewritten in terms of the oppression of women. We must go back to ancient female religions like witchcraft." I do not see the real woman rights, but only disrespect to the human history at all. The ancient Chinese wisdom says: “Do not forget the past; it is the teacher of future”. If people would forget their history, they will not have a future. By this way feminism do not have future. Also, are we really “must go back” to the pagan practice? They should know history of ancient pagan civilizations which were destroyed because of their low level of morality. They were destroyed because they had absolute freedom from any right laws, rules, authority, and monotheism.
Gloria Marie Stainem, American feminist icon, journalist and women's rights advocate, said: "We don't just want to destroy capitalism; we want to tear down the whole f___ patriarchy." During the Cold War if some political leader would say these words in the USA, he would be imprisoned as a public enemy. But we have “universal rights” for each moral moron and they can say and popularize everything what they think. Why I should respect feminism if they consider "The fiction of fatherhood is a giant religion called Christianity"(Jill Johnston in Lesbian Nation)? I have the same right to criticize the feminism; however, I have more authoritative basis on my side, such as history, true science, and the Bible.
What are more stubborn things as statistic facts? Let see the statistical data on the American family by The Howard Center for Family, Religion, and Society.
At the dawn of the twenty-first century, the recent U.S. census provides a snapshot of the condition of American families. In 1970 traditional family households made up 81 percent of all households, but this percentage has dropped to 68 percent in 2003. Single-mother families increased from 3 million in 1970 to 10 million in 2003, and the number of single-father families grew to 2 million in 2003 from less than half a million in 1970. Nearly one-third of all American children are born out of wedlock, and more than half will spend some portion of their childhood in never-formed or broken families. Roughly, one American child is born outside of marriage every twenty-five seconds. One estimate posits that up to 70 percent of American children will live at some point with a single parent. Single-parent homes make up a significant portion of the American sociological landscape…
Is not it a significant result of the feminism and the sexual revolution in the middle of XX century? The sin of the feminism is in disgracing and substitution the general terms such as “mother”, “family”, “maternity”, “husband”, and “wife” by more abstract words such as “household”, “caretaker”, “gender”. The sin of the feminism is in “discourage full-time homemaking”. The sin is in casting-off all previous traditional rules and guidelines.  
As for me, I want a wife. Yes, I want a wife of feminine gender. I want a woman as woman, not as man. I do not need another man as I am. I need a woman not equal to me as man, but equal to woman, as my mother, grandmother. I could not have a chance to be born if my mother would decide to be equal to man and be the feminist activist. There is my point of view, and it is not popular in that time and society. Well, what of it? I prefer to keep the tradition of glorious past and I hope I will get the same glorious future.

* * * * * * * * *

LAF: Ladies Against Feminism -->

* * * * * * * * *

Twin-Blog on Blogspot.com

Russian writing

 

on top